Your Complete Guide to T. Rex Dinosaurs!
Fast Facts about Tyrannosaurus rex Dinosaurs
Tyrannosaurus rex (pronunciation: "tie-RAN-oh-SAW-rus") - The name means "Tyrant Lizard King"
Taxonomy: Dinosauria (Dinosaur) - Saurischia (Lizard Hipped) - Theropoda (Beast Footed) - Tyranosauroidea (Superfamily) - Tyranosauridae (Family) - Tyrannosaurini (Tribe) - Tyranosaurus (Genus) - T. rex (species)
Age: Late Cretaceous
Despite its popularity, T. rex only existed for about 2 million years.
It lived for a short time period around 68 to 65 million years ago.
Extinction: T. rex was one of the last dinosaurs to ever exist. It went extinct at the end Cretaceous mass extinction event, which brought a close to the age of Dinosaurs.
Discovery: Osborn, 1905
The discovery of T. rex is an intriguing story (discussed in an article here), heres the brief version:
T. rex was originally discovered by Barnum Brown in 1900 while doing excavations in Wyoming. However, Brown thought the fossil was something else. Osborn, in 1905 caught the error and names it T. rex.
Distribution: Western North America (Laramidia):
Despite its popularity, T. rex only lived on an island continent called "Laramidia". This continent is present day Western North America.
Body Size: Pretty Big! 12 meters (40 feet)!
Although T. rex was not the largest carnivour, it was pretty substantial.
T. rex could reach a length of over 40 feet and weight over 7 tons (equal to 93 people).
Bone Crushing Bite: Strongest Bite of any Land Animal... Ever!
T. rex had MASSSIVE jaws with HUGE muscles. It had the strongest bite of any animal ever! One tooth could produce up to 12,800 pounds of force!
T. rex was the Apex predator of the Western United States. It could eat just about anything.
Ceratopsians (triceratops) and Hadrosaurs (duck-billed dinosaurs) were amung its favorites. Evidence shows it even ate other T. rex's!
Speed:Fast: 18 mph
Recent studies indicate T. rex could run at speeds over 18 mph!
Tyrannosaurus rex fossils have been found in the following formations:
|Mid-Late Cretaceous Formations||Locations|
|Hell Creek Formation||Montana, N & S Dakota|
|McRae Formation||New Mexico|
|Willow Creek Formation||Alberta|
General Overview of Tyrannosaurus rex
Map of North America at the late
Cretaceous. North America was split
into two island continents by the Western
Interior Seaway. The West was called
Laramidia, and the East was called
Appalachia. Both island continents had
different Dinosaur fauna. T. rex was
confined to Laramidia.
Image by the U.S. Geological Survey.
Tyrannosaurus rex is one of the largest and most popular members of the Tyrannosaurus family of dinosaurs.
This is most likely due to the fact that is was one of the most dangerous predators to walk the earth. T. rex is
characterized by a large, oversized head with foreword facing eyes, huge muscular jaws, robust serrated teeth,
a powerful tail, and tiny arms.
T rex was the apex predator of its time. It was a powerful carnivore that hunted many other large dinosaurs including the Ankylosaurs, Triceratops (Ceratopsids) and Edmontosaurus (Hadrosaurs), and the last Sauropods (Sauropods were nearly extinct in Western North America by time T. rex arrived). Although the Tyrannosaurs have a long history, the species, Tyrannosaurus rex, lived for a short time period, about 3 million years during the very end of the Cretaceous time period. It was the last of the Tyrannosaurs. The first fossils are around 67 million years old and it died with the other dinosaurs 65 million years ago during the end Cretaceous mass extinction event.
T. rex only lived on a small island continent called Laramindia (now western North America). During the Cretaceous, a large seaway (the Western Interior Seaway) split North America in half. The western half of North America is called Laramindia, and the eastern half is called Appalachia. Fossils of T. rex from Laramindia are found from Canada down to Texas. T. rex shared this island continent with many other well known clades of dinosaurs including the hadrosaurs, and the ceratopsids, such as Triceratops.
Isolated teeth and isolated bone fragments of T. rex are common, however, associated specimens are rare. Under 60 partial specimens have been described by science. (Here is the list). Among these specimens, only 13 are over 25% complete. The most complete T. rex is called "Sue" (PR2081), which was found in 1990 in South Dakota. Sue is 80% complete and can be seen in the Field Museum of Chicago.
The Holotype Tyrannosaurus rex (T-rex) fossil skeleton, CM 9380 (AMNH 973), showing it's powerful jaws,
large teeth, and small arms. This specimen is on display at the Carnegie Museum of Natural History.
This is the correct posture theropods had. They did not stand upright like Barny.
Tyrannosaurus rex Anatomy and Physiology - Skull, Arms, and Speed:
T. rex is a very specialized dinosaur with many unique anatomical features. These next paragraphs highlight some of the main features of this apex predator: T. rex could crush other dinosaurs bones, it actually used its tiny arms, and it was fast and agile!
Compared to other theropod dinosaurs, Tyrannosaurus rex had the largest, most robust, and most powerful skull.
It was clearly specialized. T. rex underwent dramatic skeletal changes as it grew from a hatchling into a full
grown adult. The skull starts out very slender with a somewhat long snout, looking more like other theropods of
the time. However, as it aged, the skull became significantly larger, the snout became blunt, and the jaws
became very robust. By looking at an adult T. rex skull and comparing it to other theropods of the time,
one can tell the jaws would have been much more muscular.
In 2012, Bates did a computer study of the bite force of a human, Allosaurus, juvenile T. rex, and an adult T. rex (STAN-BHI3033). The study was much more accurate than previous estimates because they used "dynamic musculoskeletal models" to simulate the maximum bite forces of the animals. Bates found juvenile T. rex had a small bite force, indicating a diet of small prey. While adult T. rex had an incredibly powerful bite force, much higher than other theropods. The bite force was found to be between 35,000 and 57,000 Newtons per tooth (up to 12,800 pounds of force per tooth) (Bates, 2012). In laymans terms, Bates says, 12,000 lbs is the equivalent of an elephant sitting on a person!
This bite force is MUCH more powerful than any other land animal EVER. While other theropods, like Allosaurus, and juvenile T. rex's probably could not chomp through bone, an adult T. rex could crush any bone with ease. This means it could have fed on even the largest dinosaurs. Dr. Bates concludes the extremely powerful bite makes "it one of the most dangerous predators to have roamed our planet."
This graph shows the bite force of T. rex
compared to other animals, including similar
theropods, crocodiles, some mammals, and the
creature with the largest bite force known, C. megalodon.
Bite force values of the reptiles are from: Erickson, et al. (2012). The Sharks are from: Wroe, et al. (2008). Most dinosaurs from this table are from: Bates and Falkingham (2012).
Image of an arm of T. rex
T. rex 's arms are probably the most perplexing feature of this terrifying dinosaur. For a 40 foot animal, they
are only about the length of human arms. While other theropods, such as the Ornithomimosaurs, were developing
long arms, all of the large Tyrannosaurs across the globe had developed very short and stubby arms.
A quick look makes many people think they were useless and vestigial, and therefore they simply shrunk in size. However, the rest of T. rex 's anatomy appears to have been highly specialized. It would be strange to see a very specialized body plan that contains small useless arms.
A closer look at the few fossil arms of T. rex show they still had large menacing claws on their remaining two finger digits; they did not reduce in size. Also, Lipkin and Cerpenter (2008) found that T. rex arms were actually incredibly powerful and muscular.
An image of very muscular, shortened arms with large claws shouts specialization. They were not vestigial. If they were highly specialized, like the rest of T. rex's anatomy, the question becomes what were these strong, sharp tooth picks used for?
This is a diagram of a Tyrannosaurus
rex arm. This work is by Conty
and is Public Domain.
Rothschild and Molnar (2008) investigated Tyrannosaur arms. They looked for stress fractures in the
arms of T. rex and found that stress fractures were common. What's the big deal about
stress fractures? A stress fracture is different from a break. Stress fractures occur during high impact and repeated activities.
For example, stress fractures are not uncommon in people training for a marathon. Stress fractures occur with extensive use or overuse, not because of
trauma. This means T. rex was actively using its arms for something.
So, what did T. rex use its arms for? This is where speculation comes to play. They could have been used for some sort of mating behavior, or they may have been reduced to help balance the large skull of T. rex. Perhaps they helped T. rex go from a sitting to standing posture, or maybe they could have been used to stick into struggling prey. The list goes on and on.
Rothschild and Molnar (2008), suggested an answer to this. When looking at predators, stress fractures occur in their limbs when holding onto struggling prey. Previously, in 2001, Rothschild and others studied the numerous stress fractures in the limbs of Allosaurus, a Jurassic theropod. They concluded this theropod actively used its arms and legs to hold and grasp struggling prey. Rothschild and Molnar came to the same conclusion about T. rex's arms, that holding onto struggling prey could cause this type of injury. Short muscular arms with large claws could hold the prey steady while the giant, bone crushing, jaws tore through the struggling dinosaur. Lipkin and Carpenter (2008) also support this. They note that the many injuries to the dinosaurs' shoulders were probably the result of predator-prey interactions.
Figure 2 from
Sellers & Manning (2007).
Click on the image or link to view the full
article. This figure shows body mass vs top
speeds from the simulations. Tyrannosaurus
rex is on the far right. The fastest theropod
on thier chart is Compsognathus, a tiny 1m
The best way to gauge the speed of a dinosaur is to study the dinosaurs tracks.
Unfortunately, there is a lack of Tyrannosaurus track ways. There have been a few isolated foot prints found in the western U.S. and Mongolia,
but these isolated footprints tell us nothing about the dinosaurs speed.
There have only been two trackways discovered so far.
1: The first trackway is from British Columbia. It was excavated between 2011 and 2012 and recently published in 2014 (McCrea et al, 2014). This track way consists of 3 individual Tyrannosaurs walking together. Based on the gate of one of the track ways, it has been deduced that one of the tyrannosaurs was walking between 6.5 - 8.5 km/hr (4 - 5.3 mph) (McCrea et al, 2014). Unfortunately, this track way is of a Tyrannosaurs walking, not running. So the running speed from this trackway cannot be determined.
2: The second trackway is from the Lance Formation in Wyoming. It was discovered near the Paleon Museum in Glenrock years ago, and with the help of Scott Persons, was recently researched and published on. These tracks are either of a juvenile T. rex or a Nanotyrannosaurus (Smith et al, 2016). Calculations based on the tracks give a speed of between 4.5 and 8 km/h (2.8 mph and 5 mph) (Smith et al, 2016). Like the previous tracks, these tracks are of a fast walking or trotting dinosaur. So, again, the running speed of a T. rex cannot be determined.
However, when compared to other dinosaurs, T. rex, had a faster walking / trotting speed than other large herbivores, including its prey, the duckbilled dinosaurs (Smith et al., 2016).
Until further trackways are found, we must rely on other methods to deduce the maximum speed of a Tyrannosaur, such as the anatomy and physiology of the legs and tail, as discussed below.
Image of one of the Tyrannosaurus' tracks. Photo by Scott Persons, one of the papers authors.
In the past, T. rex was thought of as a slow and cumbersome dinosaur. It was often thought that due to its size, overcoming its own inertia would be difficult to do. If it could not move as fast as its prey, T. rex would be a terrible hunter, and would therefore need to resort to scavenging.
Figure 9 from Persons & Currie 2010.
Click on the image or link to view the full article.
This figure shows the reconstructed tail
musculature. The M. caudofemoralis muscle is
the main retractor muscle of the hind limb. A
larger retractor muscle indicates a faster animal.
Tryannosaurus had a large M. caudofemoralis.
A paper published in 2007 by Sellers and Manning shows that T. rex was not terribly slow. They developed musculoskeletal
computer models of three living animals (including a human) as well as for five theropod dinosaurs. The speeds
calculated for the three living animals were "in reasonably good agreement with accepted values." For the theropods,
they found the smaller ones were the fastest, while T. rex was the slowest. Although it was the slowest, the speed found
was still a respectable 8 m/s (18 mph), which is faster than a sprinting human and an elephant. A table of their data
is shown to the right. Sellers and Manning conclude that improved musculoskeletal models will produce even more accurate
Later, in 2010, a more accurate T. rex musculoskeletal model was created by Persons and Currie. They looked at both the leg structure and the unique tail structure of theropod dinosaurs. Theropods have tails with a structure unlike any living animal today. Persons and Currie realized the tails weren't simply a large counterbalance, but an extension of the dinosaur's leg muscles. Some of the large tail muscles gave extra power to the dinosaurs' legs. These extra muscles also added mass to the tail which would help center the inertia of the animal (center of mass). They say Tyrannosaurus had a "sizeable investment in locomotive muscle among theropods." They concluded that Tyrannosaurus had greater athleticism, in terms of running, balance, and turning agility. This evidence suggests a much more mobile and agile animal capable of chasing down prey (Persons and Currie, 2010).
In light of this new evidence, it appears T. rex may have been able to move a little faster than the 18 mile per hour value given by Sellers and Manning. T. rex also has proportionately longer legs than other theropods, enabling it to have a longer stride and faster gate. So, when all the evidence is considered, it appears T. rex's legs and tail were specialized for agility and speed, regardless of whether it could run or not.
Was Tyrannosaurus rex a Predator or Scavanger?
The debate as to whether or not T. rex was a predator or scavenger is not really a big debate. Most paleontologists agree that T. rex was an opportunistic carnivore. This conclusion is not only drawn from fossils, but from looking at predators today. There is no black and white line that separates a "predator" from a "scavenger." Nature is not that clear cut. To clarify, one can take a look at living carnivores. Two good examples often used are the lion and the hyena.
The lion is traditionally thought of as an apex predator in southern Africa. It's often depicted hunting down gazelle and wildebeests. A typical lion will hunt and kill over 15 animals per year. However, up to 40% of a lions food comes from scavenging carcasses.
The hyena is traditionally thought of as a scavenger, finding dead carcasses and gaining up on predators to steel their recent kills. However, it has been found that many hyenas hunt for most of their food. In fact, the spotted hyena hunts and kills as much as 95% of its own food (Cooper et al. 1999).
Based on the facts, a hyena is much more of a predator than a lion. However, neither is a pure predator or pure scavenger. They are opportunistic carnivores. If one researches almost any apex carnivore, one will find they are a mix of both. So, it doesn't really makes sense to group T. rex as only a predator only or a scavenger. Like most carnivores, it was probably a mix of both. How much it hunted vs scavanged will never be known. It's just reasonable to assume it was both a predator and a scavenger, like apex carnivores today.
A cast of a T rex skull at the
Academy of Natural Sciences in
Philadelphia. Although the skull
is a little crushed, one can see the
eyes clearly look forward. This is
a key trait of most active hunters.
Physical trace evidence of T. rex either hunting or scavenging is sparse. There have been many dinosaurs
found with tooth marks, tooth pieces, and bite marks from T. rex. A study of T. rex marks on Triceratops
horridus specimens even show how T. rex would have eaten them, by pulling their heads off! There have been
many digested dinosaur bones found at fossil T. rex sites (stomach contents). Bite and scrape marks from
T. rex have even been found on the bones of other T. rex (Farke, et al., 2010). This means they ate each
other! However all of this evidence simply shows T. rex ate the dinosaurs; it doesn't tell us if T. rex hunted
them or scavenged off of their bodies.
However, a paper by DePalma et al (2013), studied a T. rex tooth embedded in a hadrosaur caudal (tail) vertebra. The interesting thing about this embedded tooth is the tail vertebra began to heal over. This means T. rex bit into a living hadrosaur. DePalma's team believes the T. rex intended to eat the hadrosaur, but it managed to escape and live to see another day.
T. rex's anatomy
Besides the sparse trace evidence of predation, one can study the actual anatomy of T. rex itself and see if
it was more suited as a predator or scavenger. Looking at the various specialized body parts suggests it was
a well designed predator.
T. rex has a huge skull with large, impact resistant teeth. The jaws had the strongest bite force of any land animal ever. Paleontologists argue these overly strong jaws and solid teeth would be ideal for capturing and holding struggling prey, even a large hadrosaur or triceratops.
This is Figure 2 from McCrea et al., 2014
showing the Tyrannosaur trackway.
The full article with more images is here:
T. rex's eyes are the eyes of a predator. The dinosaur has foreword facing eyes, not eyes on the sides of the
head. Foreword facing eyes gives an animal depth perception and is a key trademark of predators.
As we now know, the tail of T. rex contains an abnormally large muscle which would have given T. rex increased speed and agility.
In 2014 a paper was published by McCrea et al., discussing the first ever discovered trackway of a Tyrannosaurus. The interesting about this trackway is that it was made by 3 Tyrannosaurs next to each other at the same time (McCrea et al, 2014). This shows some kind of "gregarious" or social behavior, which lends credibility to Tyrannosaurs hunting in packs.
Figure 2 from Carbone et al (2011).
This shows the average time a T. rex would find a
carcass compared to smaller dinosaurs. What it
shows is by time the T. rex found a carcass, it
would already be scavanged by the many
Instead of looking at the actual fossils, another team (Carbone, et al. 2011) took a different approach to
the hunter vs scavenger debate. They looked
at T. rex in an ecological context, and studied the environmental conditions of the late cretaceous.
Carbone and his teams intensive study looked at the mass and abundance of each carnivore
and herbivore that coexisted with T. rex. They looked at their population densities and related it to a modern
day ecosystem to calculate number of large carcasses available for T. rex to eat. They contend that smaller,
more abundant carnivores would have quickly consumed carcasses, and that large carcasses would have been rare (Carbone, et al., 2011).
The results suggest T. rex would have been unable to
compete as a scavanger and would have had to hunt large prey (Carbone, et al., 2011). If T. rex wasn't
a predator, there would have to be another top apex predator. None have been found.
Predatory evidence from studying the anatomy of T. rex, the healed hadrosaur vertebra and the ecological study is hard to refute. In light of this research, it seems clear that T. rex was an active predator. However, like apex preditors today, it probably exhibit both predatory and scavenging behaviors. Just how much T. rex hunted vs. scavenged will probably never be known, and it probably varied by the environmental conditions it lived in. What is known is that T. rex was at the top of the food chain in Western North America during the late Cretaceous.
Juvenile T. rex vs Adult T. rex vs Nanotyrannosaurus lancensis - More information required
It's possibly a juvenile Tyrannosaurus rex or an adult Nanotyrannus lancensis from the Hell Creek Formation of southern Montana. Either way, it is one of the best preserved and most complete specimens found.
RIGHT: Peck's Rex is a 38 foot, 21 year old dinosaur.
It is an adult Tyrannosaurus rex from the Hell Creek Formation near Fort Peck, Montana.
Today, paleontologists realize that juvenile dinosaurs do not look like their adult counterparts. Besides
the drastic size change, the skulls and other bones morphed and changed shape. Sometimes the
youngsters look nothing like the adults. This makes determining a juvenile species of a particular
dinosaur very difficult.
In the past when different looking skulls were found, they were named a new genus and or species. Now, paleontologists have the daunting task of determining which species are valid and which species are simply juveniles of an already known adult species. A good example is famous ceratopsian, Triceratops. Back in the day, there were 16 species of Triceratops. Today, there are only 2. The other 14 "species" turned out to be juveniles in different stages of growth.
This juvenile vs adult issue might also be present in T. rex. The problem is there are not enough fossils to study. Adult T. rex fossils are hard to come by, but it appears juveniles are even more difficult to find, especially when no one is sure what they exactly look like.
In 1946 Charles described a skull of a small theropod that was eventually named Nanotyrannosaurus lancensis. This
small skull was long and slender with many small sharp teeth. Later, in 2001, a nearly complete specimen of N. lancensis
was discovered. This specimen is called "Jane" (BMRP 2002.4.1).
The fact that no juvenile T. rex fossils had been discovered raised suspicions that Nanotyrannosaurus was actually a juvenile T. rex. Some paleontologists took a second look at Nanotyrannosaurus. They studied the holotype and concluded it was in fact a juvenile T. rex. Much of this was based on age determination of the fossil. Other paleontologists studied the skull and came to the conclusion Nanotyrannosaurus was its own species and not a juvenile T. rex.
Much of this was based on the fact that a closely related species (Tarbosaurus bataar of Asia) did not lose teeth as they aged, but for N. lancensis to be a juvenile T. rex, it would have had to lose many teeth.
The debate still goes on today. The problem is there is simply not enough study material to validate any assumption. Other "juvenile" specimens have been found. Unfortunately, they are in private collections and are unavailable for study.
Juvenile T. rex's were obviously much smaller, and probably less robust than the adults. This means they probably occupied a different ecological niche than their adults. But is Nanotryrannosaurus a juvenile T. rex? For now, Nanotrannosaurus lancensis is officially a different species than Tyrannosaurus rex. The debate will not be settled until new fossil specimens are found and studied.
Did T. rex have feathers? Maybe not.
An illustration of Yutyrannus huali, the giant feathered tyrannosaur that lived in a colder climate than T. rex
Illustration by Lida Xing and Yi Liu.
Image of a skin impression of the "Wyrex"
tyrannosaurus dinosaur (BHI 6230). As you
can see, at least this part of the
Tyrannosaurus rex had no feathers,
or feather like structures.
Since the discovery of feathered dinosaurs in the 1990's, it has become clear that many families of theropod dinosaurs
had feathers, or at least, primitive feather like structures (protofeathers). Well known theropods such as velociraptor
and microraptor had protofeathers. Tyrannosaurus is a very large theropod, so could it have also had feathers?
To answer this question, one needs to look at the Tyrannosaur family and see if any of its relatives had feathers.
As it turns out, in 2004, a theropod named Dilong paradoxus was discovered in China (Xu X. et al 2004). Dilong, a small 1.6 m theropod, was found to be covered in protofeathers; the "feathers" looked like hair like strands (Xu X. et al 2004). Dilong is also considered to be a distant member of the Tyrannosaurid family that lived 65 million years before T. rex. This means protofeathers are present in Tyrannosaurus' family tree.
Later, in 2012, Xu X. described another nearly complete feathered Tyrannosaur relative named Yutyrannus huali (Beautiful Feathered Tyrant). This theropod is a little younger in age, about 125 million years old, and is more closely related to T. rex than Dilong. What's interesting about Yutrannus is that it's 30 foot in length. Although it's still smaller than T. rex, it's the largest feathered theropod yet discovered. The simple feathers on Yutrannus are not well preserved, but they are up to 8 inches long and may have covered most of the body (Xu X. et al, 2012). This discovery showed that even large theropods could have feathers, or feather like structures.
However, as tantalizing as it is, one cannot conclude that T. rex had protofeathers. A well preserved T. rex specimen found in 2002 named "Wyrex" (BHI 6230) was found with some small associated skin impressions. The impressions clearly show scales; no feather or hair like structures are seen. In places on the body where Yutrannus showed feather structures, T. rex only showed scales. So, it can be concluded that T. rex was not covered in protofeathers.
One difference between Yutrannus and T. rex is the climate in which they lived. Yutrannus is from China and lived in a colder climate with harsh winters (Amiot et al., 2011). Many dinosaurs in that region had filaments and other protofeather like structures (Amiot et al., 2011). Perhaps Yutrannus needed protofeathers for insulation, whereas T. rex did not. This does not rule out the possibility that T. rex supported feathers in only certain areas, or that juveniles had feather structures, but lost them as they aged. More specimens are required before this question can be fully answered.
RIGHT: Specimen ZCDM V5000, the holotype Yutyrannus huali. This image shows the skull. Image by Zang Hailong.
Recommended T. rex Books, Fossils, and Gifts.
Tyrannosaurus Sue: The Extraordinary Saga of the Largest, Most Fought Over T-Rex Ever Found
This is one of the few adult books out there about T. rex. This true (non-fiction) story plays out like it could be made into a movie. It discusses "Sue" one of the most famous Tyrannosaurs. After the discovery, a battle began over the fossil. The battle was between commercial fossil hunters, corporate giants, major museums, law officers, government prosecutors, and a Native American tribe. This intriguing book is written from Peter Larson's point of view, and covers the events in wonderful detail, including the government raid into the Black Hills Institute. It's a must read for anyone interested in Tyrannosaurs and interested in the corruption and ignorance that goes with a seemingly benign branch of science.
Tyrannosaurus rex, the Tyrant King (Life of the Past)
Peter L. Larson, Kenneth Carpenter (Editors), 2008
This is one of the best Tyrannosaurus rex books out there. It is a collection of everything T. rex, from it's range based on stratigraphy, why it has short arms, to soft tissue reconstruction. It includes many tables, drawings, and photographs. The book also comes with an accompanying CD. The CD has loads of images and animations, including a simulation of the famous T. rex, Stan. This is a wonderful resource for all things T. rex! The book is, however, very technical and not for the casual audience. If you are a T. rex enthusiast, this book is for you.
T. rex is so popular it's hard to imaging you can actually have a real tooth from one! Tyrannosaurus teeth are not that common. Usually you can find teeth from its distant cousin Carcharodontosaurus for sale. However, Fossil Era has a selection of real Tyrannosaurus teeth. Check 'em out!
Elenco Science Tech T-Rex Skeleton 36" Scale Replica Model
This is a 3 foot, true to scale, Tyrannosaurus skeleton with 51 realistic pieces. This is one of the most realistic replicas I have found on the internet. It's an awesome educational piece for any T-rex fanatic, young or old!
R. Amiot, X. Wang, Z. Zhou, X. Wang, E. Buffetaut, C. Lecuyer, Z. Ding, F. Fluteau, T. Hibino, N. Kusuhashi, J. Mo, V. Suteethorn, Y. Wang, X. Xu, F. Zhang. Oxygen isotopes of East Asian dinosaurs reveal exceptionally cold Early Cretaceous climates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1011369108
Farlow, O. James, Brett-Surman, M.K., Editors. (1997) The Complete Dinosaur. IN: Indiana University Press.
Fastovsky, E. David, Weishampel, B. David (1996). The Evolution And Extinction Of The Dinosaurs. NY: Cambridge University Press.
C. Carbone, S. T. Turvey, J. Bielby. (2011) Intra-guild competition and its implications for one of the biggest terrestrial predators, Tyrannosaurus rex. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences; DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2497
Cooper, S.M., Holekamp, K.E., Smale, K. (1999) A seasonal feast: long-term analysis of feeding behavior in the spotted hyaena. Crocuta crocuta (Erxleben). Afr. J. Ecol. 37, 149-160.
Andrew Allen Farke, Nicholas R. Longrich, John R. Horner, Gregory M. Erickson, Philip J. Currie. (2010) Cannibalism in Tyrannosaurus rex. PLoS ONE, 2010 5 (10): e13419 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013419
Forster Catherine A. (1996) Species resolution in Triceratops: cladistic and morphometric approaches. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 16:259-270.
Lipkin, C., & Carpenter, K. (2008) Looking again at the forelimb of Tyrannosaurus rex. In: Tyrannosaurus rex, the tyrant king. Larson, P. & Carpenter, K. (eds.). Indiana University Press. Bloomington, IN. pp.167-190.
McCrea RT, Buckley LG, Farlow JO, Lockley MG, Currie PJ, et al. (2014) A 'Terror of Tyrannosaurs': The First Trackways of Tyrannosaurids and Evidence of Gregariousness and Pathology in Tyrannosauridae. PLoS ONE 9(7): e103613. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103613.g002
Ostrom J.H, Wellnhofer P. (1986) The Munich specimen of Triceratops with a revision of the genus. Zitteliana. 14, 111-158.
Sellers, William Irvin & Manning, Philip Lars. (Nov. 2007) Estimating dinosaur maximum running speeds using evolutionary robotics. Proceedings B, The Roal Society Full Article Here
Smith, Sean D., Persons, Scott W., Xing, Lida. (2016) A tyrannosaur trackway at Glenrock, Lance Formation (Maastrichtian), Wyoming. Cretaceous Research, Volume 61, June 2016, Pages 1-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2015.12.020
W. Scott Persons, Philip J. Currie. (2010) The Tail of Tyrannosaurus: Reassessing the Size and Locomotive Importance of the M. caudofemoralis in Non-Avian Theropods. The Anatomical Record: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology; DOI: 10.1002/ar.21290
Rothschild, B. M. & Molnar, R. E. (2008) Looking again at the forelimb of Tyrannosaurus rex. In: Tyrannosaurus rex, the tyrant king. Larson, P. & Carpenter, K. (eds.). Indiana University Press. Bloomington, IN. pp.287-304.
Rothschild, B., Tanke, D. H., and Ford, T. L. (2001) Theropod stress fractures and tendon avulsions as a clue to activity: In: Mesozoic Vertebrate Life, edited by Tanke, D. H., and Carpenter, K. (eds.) Indiana University Press. Bloomington, IN. pp. 331-336.
S. Wroe, D. R. Huber, M. Lowry, C. McHenry, K. Moreno, P. Clausen, T. L. Ferrara, E. Cunningham6 M. N. Dean, A. P. Summers. (2008) Three-dimensional computer analysis of white shark jaw mechanics: how hard can a great white bite? Journal of Zoology. Volume 276, Issue 4, p. 336-342, December 2008.
Online PDF of Article
Xu X., Norell, M. A., Kuang, X., Wang X., Zhao Q., & Jia C. (2004) Basal tyrannosauroids from China and evidence for protofeathers in tyrannosauroids - Nature 431 (7009): 680-684.
Xu, X., Wang, K., Zhang, K., Ma, Q., Xing, L., Sullivan, C., Hu, D., Cheng, S. et al. (2012) A gigantic feathered dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of China. Nature 484: 92-95. (.PDF here)