|
Shark Teeth Sharks are related to Skates and Rays, as they are all in the Chondrichthyes Class. Fish in this class have a skeleton made of cartilage instead of true bone. What this means for the fossil collector is bones from these animals seldom fossilize. Occasionally a vertebra may be found, however mostly the hard shark teeth and ray crushing plates are found. |
|
Alopias cf. latidens (Leriche, 1909)
(Thresher Shark) Identification based on Kent (1994, pp.71-73). These teeth are uncommon in this area. Thresher sharks can get up to 11 feet in length, however almost half of its length is in its long tail. Modern Thresher sharks (A. vulpinus) are pelagic (open ocean sharks), and nocturnal. They usually eat small fish and squid. These fossil Thresher sharks probably had a similar behavior to their modern counterparts. |
![]() |
Age: Location: Size: |
|
Formation: Age: Location: Size: |
|
Carcharinus
(Whaler Sharks) The Whaler Sharks are a large group of sharks, with over 57 extant species. They are found virtually all over the globe. They feed on a variety of prey, from bony fish, other sharks and rays, and squid Whaler Sharks were also very common in the Miocene seas. Teeth from the Whaler Shark genus are among the most common teeth found at many places in the Chesapeake group. It can be difficult to distinguish between many of these species based on their fossil teeth alone. This genus of shark still populates the Chesapeake bay today. The bay even acts as one of the most important nursery grounds on the east coast for the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus. |
|
Carcharhinus brachyurus (Gunther, 1870) aka egertoni (Agassiz, 1843)
(Bronze Whaler or Copper Shark) Identification based on Kent (1994) & Purdy et al (2001). I use to call these teeth C. egertoni, but I guess that name is synonymous with C. brachyurus. Whatever they are, here is their info: This species of shark is still extant today. The lowers are easily confused with lemon shark teeth (Negioprion sp.), however, C. brachyurus lowers have tiny serrations at the top of their teeth, whereas lemon sharks do not. |
![]() |
Age: Location: Size: |
|
Carcharhinus priscus (Agassiz, 1843)
(Gray Shark) Identification based on Kent (1994, pp.80-82). This genus of tooth is the most common found at many places along the Calvert Cliffs. |
![]() |
C. Priscus teeth have finely serrated enameloid shoulders and crown. Uppers and lowers are very difficult to distinguish, here they are shown in no particular order. Age: Location: Size: |
|
Carcharias sp.
(Sand Tiger Shark) Identification based on Kent (1994, pp.39-43). Some Sand Tiger species can reach lengths of about 10 feet. Their fang like teeth are ideal for grasping fish. Their diet consists mostly of fish and sometimes crustaceans. |
![]() |
They are probably a mix of C. acutissima, and reticulata. Formation: Age: Location: Size: |
|
Carcharias cuspidata (Agassiz, 1843b)
(Sand Tiger Shark) Identification based on Kent (1994, pp.80-82). |
![]() |
C. cuspidata is one of the more robust Carcharias teeth
found at the cliffs. Formation: Age: Location: Size: |
|
Megatooth Sharks (C. megalodons and C. subauriculatus)
The Megatooths have moved to their own page. Click here to get to them |
![]() |
Formation: Age: Location: Size: |
|
Galeocerdo aduncus (Agassiz, 1843)
(Tiger Shark) Identification based on Kent (1994) & Purdy et al (2001). This species lived from the Oligocene into the Miocene and probably evolved into the extant G. cuvier. However, Purdy et al (2001) believe G. aduncus is not available as a scientific name. However, until a new name is assigned, I will continue to refer to it as G. aduncus. This extinct species is also smaller than the extant (living) Tiger shark (G. cuvier). |
![]() |
Notice the coarse serrations on the enameloid shoulders. Uppers and lowers are very difficult to tell apart, these are arranged in no particular order. Age: Location: Size: |
|
Galeocerdo contortus (Gibbs, 1849)
(Tiger Shark) Identification based on Kent (1994) & Purdy et al (2001). This species of Tiger Shark is very common along the U.S. East Coast deposits, but rarely found along the U.S. West Coast deposits. This species Lived from the upper Oligocene and became extinct in the Miocene. There are a few big differences between these and G. aduncus. First, the crowns are twisted, looking pathological, as shown in the profile view. Also, the enameloid shoulder has very fine serrations, unlike the coarse serrations of G. aduncus. This slender tooth form probably means the contortus fed on bony fish, while the aduncus and extant cuvier species fed on a wider variety of prey. This extinct species is also smaller than the extant (living) Tiger shark (G. cuvier). |
![]() |
The roots on lower contortus teeth are more robust than the roots on uppers. However, laterals and anterio-laterals are very difficult to tell apart. Age: Location: Size: |
|
Hemipristis serra (Agassiz, 1843)
(Snaggeltooth Shark) Identification based on Kent (1994) & Purdy et al (2001). This species lived from the late Oligocene into the early Pleistocene. They are commonly called Snaggeltooth Sharks due to the large serrations on their teeth. Species of Hemipristis are extant today, however, they are only found in tropical waters, and are much smaller than the fossil species. The fossil species are also found worldwide. |
![]() |
As you can see, uppers and lowers are very different. To further demonstrate this difference, here is a modern Hemipristis jaw. Age: Location: Size: |
![]() |
Age: Location: Size: |
![]() |
Age: Location: Size: Date: |
|
Isurus (Rafinesque, 1810)
(Mako Sharks) Identification based on Kent (1994) & Purdy et al (2001). Mako sharks can grow up to 12 feet in length. Some fossil Makos probably were slightly larger than this. Makos are generally pelagic, or open ocean sharks. Modern Makos eat a variety of prey, including other sharks, fish (including tuna and swordfish), and squid. Some fossil Makos evolved into the present day Shortfin, and Longfin Mako sharks. Others may have evolved into the modern Great White shark. The "Makos" that evolved into the Great Whites should be assigned into the genus Cosmopolitodus to distinguish them from other Makos (Isurus sp.). However, Purdy et al (2001) believes Isurus could not have evolved into the Carcharodon genera. Among his evidence is a reference to Mitochondrial DNA sequences that estimate the Carcharodon origins in the Paleocene or early Eocene, which is much to early if Isurus evolved into Carcharodon. |
|
Isurus desori (Sismonda, 1849)
(Shortfin Mako Shark) Identification based on Kent (1994) & Purdy et al (2001). This species lived from the late Oligocene into the Pliocene, and probably evolved into the extant I. oxyrhinchus the Shortfin Mako. |
![]() |
Left is the lingual view, right is the profile view. Formation: Age: Location: Size: Date: |
![]() |
Formation: Age: Location: Size: Date: |
![]() |
The left two are labial views, the right two are lingual views. Formation: Age: Location: Size: |
|
Isurus retroflexus (Agassiz, 1843)
(Longfin Mako Shark) Identification based on Kent (1994). This species lived in the Miocene, and probably evolved into the extant I. paucus, the Longfin Mako. |
![]() |
The first view is the lingual view, the second is the labial view. In the labial view, there is a deep groove separating the platform from the rest of the tooth, this can be seen as the dark line running across the root. Formation: Age: Location: Size: |
|
Isurus hastalis (Agassiz, 1843) (exctinct Giant Mako Shark) Identification based on Kent (1994) & Purdy et al (2001). This was one of the larger Mako sharks. Some teeth can get to be over 3", which make for a very large shark (over 20 feet in length). It lived from the Oligocene into the Pliocene. This is the species whose predecessors are thought by some to have evolved into the extant Great White (Carcharodon carcharias). If this is the case, it should be called Cosmopolitodus hastalis. However, Purdy et al (2001) provides evidence against this, including Mitochondrial DNA sequences that estimate the Carcharodon origins in the Paleocene or early Eocene, which is much to early if Isurus evolved into Carcharodon. Also, ther appear to be two forms of this shark, or two species, I hastalis and I xiphodon. The xiphodons have a broader blade than the hastalis. I make no distinction here between species. Check the Lee Creek page to see examples of both species. |
![]() |
Click on the pic to see the trip it was found on. Formation: Age: Location: Size: Date: |
![]() |
Click on the pic to see the trip it was found on. Formation: Age: Location: Size: Date: |
![]() |
Click on the pic to see the trip it was found on. Formation: Age: Location: Size: Date: |
![]() |
Click on the pic to see the trip it was found on. Formation: Age: Location: Size: Date: |
![]() |
Click on the pic to see the trip it was found on. Formation: Age: Location: Size: Date: |
![]() |
Click on the pic to see the trip it was found on. Formation: Age: Location: Size: Date: |
![]() |
The first view is the lingual view, the second is the labial view. Formation: Age: Location: Size: |
![]() |
Formation: Age: Location: Size: Date: |
![]() |
We found this one while snorkeling. View a pic of it when it was found Formation: Age: Location: Size: Date: |
![]() |
Click on the pic to see the trip it was found on. Formation: Age: Location: Size: Date: |
|
Isurus sp.
(Mako Shark) |
![]() |
Notice some juvenile makos have cusps. Formation: Age: Location: Size: |
|
Negaprion eurybathrodono (Blake, 1862)
(Lemon Shark) Identification based on Kent (1994). This species of lemon shark only lived in the Miocene. |
![]() |
Lowers can be easily confused with Carcharhinus sp. lowers, however they have smooth to very week serrated enameloid shoulders, where Carcharhinus sp. have serrated enameloid shoulders. Formation: Age: Location: Size: |
![]() |
Formation: Age: Location: Size: |
|
Notorhynchus cepedianus (Peron, 1807) aka primigenius (Agassiz, 1843)
(Sevengill Cow Shark) Identification based on Kent (1994) & Purdy et al (2001). Purdy et al (2001) believe these teeth are identical to the extant N. cepedianus, and therefore N. primigenius is just synonymous to N. cepedianus. Cow sharks are very primitive sharks, and look almost as weird as their teeth. Cow sharks lack the many dorsal fins on their backs that most sharks have. Instead, they only have a single dorsal fin toward their tail. They are also very wide and bulky. This species is extant today, but rare. They are active in shallow waters and are very aggressive. They can get up to 10 feet in length. Their diet consists of mainly other sharks, rays, bony fish, and seals. |
![]() |
Notice the small cusps on mesial edge of the lateral, whereas Hexanchus (Sixgill Cow Shark) laterals have fine serrations. Notorynchus teeth are MUCH more common than Hexanchus teeth. Click on the pic to see the trip this was found on. Formation: Age: Location: Size: Date: |
![]() |
Formation: Age: Location: Size: |
![]() |
Notorhynchus teeth are commonly found broken, such as the teeth in this pic. Formation: Age: Location: Size: |
|
Rhizoprionodon fischeuri (Joleaud, 1912d) (Sharpnose Shark) Identification based on Kent (1994) This is a small shark, roughly 5 feet long, with a long snout (hence the name). This species is very rare in the Calvert formation. This may be partly due to their tiny size. There is a large sexual dimorphism in lower teeth, as the male and female lowers look very different from one another. |
![]() |
These teeth are very small, with one pronounced enameloid shoulder, and two large lingual protuberances surrounding the nutrient groove. They also have no serrations on the crown or enameloid shoulders. Formation: Age: Location: Size: |
|
Sphyrna laevissimus (Cope, 1867) (Hammerhead Shark) Identification based on Kent (1994). Hammer Head Sharks can get up to 11 feet in length. They feed on a variety of prey, including other sharks, bony fish, and crustaceans. This species lived only in the Miocene A species of Hammerhead, the Common Hammerhead (Sphyrna zygaena), still populates the Chesapeake bay today, and is one of the largest sharks in the bay. |
![]() |
These are much less common than grey shark teeth, and, if you're not careful, they can easily be confused with them. However, notice the deep notch in the roots, also there are no serrations present on the teeth. Formation: Age: Location: Size: |
|
Squatina subserrata "lerichei" (Munster, 1846)
(Angel Shark) Identification based on Kent (1994) & Purdy et al (2001). Angel sharks are very flat, looking more like a Ray than a Shark. Some species can reach lengths up to 6 feet. Angel sharks bury themselves on the Ocean bottom, and wait for prey to swim by. They feed on fish, mollusks, crustaceans. Their mouths house numerous tiny teeth for grasping. Because Squantina teeth are very small, they are difficult to find. All of my teeth were found by screening. This fossil species lived from the late Oligocene to the Miocene. |
![]() |
These teeth are tiny and hard to spot, but are very easy to identify when found. Formation: Age: Location: Size: |
| Shark Vertebrae |
|
Shark Vertebral centra Identification based on Kent (1994). Although sharks are made of Cartilage, their vertebra sometimes fossilizes. Shark vertebrae pieces are fairly common. |
![]() |
Stress cracks running to the center of shark vertebrae are very common, and are caused from the heat and pressure on the vertebrae during the fossilization process. Formation: Age: Location: Size: |
![]() |
Shark vertebrae these sizes are decent finds at the cliffs. The dark circles on the larger one are barnacle marks. The larger one was found by snorkeling. Formation: Age: Location: Size: Date: |